Agrobacteria-Rhizobia Complex

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: start » literature
literature

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
literature [2023/05/18 09:29] – [Plasmids] chkliterature [2023/10/18 13:30] (current) – chk
Line 6: Line 6:
   * Nester (2015) //Agrobacterium//: nature’s genetic engineer. Front Plant Sci 5:730. [[https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00730]]   * Nester (2015) //Agrobacterium//: nature’s genetic engineer. Front Plant Sci 5:730. [[https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00730]]
   * Hwang et al. (2017) //Agrobacterium//-mediated plant transformation: biology and applications. Arabidopsis Book 15:e0186. [[https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0186]]   * Hwang et al. (2017) //Agrobacterium//-mediated plant transformation: biology and applications. Arabidopsis Book 15:e0186. [[https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0186]]
-  * Weisberg et al. (2023) Virulence and ecology of agrobacteria in the context of evolutionary genomics. Annu Rev Phytopathol. [[https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-021622-125009]] +  * Hooykaas (2023) The Ti plasmid, driver of Agrobacterium pathogenesis. Phytopathology 113:594–604. [[https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-11-22-0432-IA]] 
 +  * Weisberg et al. (2023) Virulence and ecology of agrobacteria in the context of evolutionary genomics. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 61:1-23. [[https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-021622-125009]]
  
 ===== Genomospecies ===== ===== Genomospecies =====
Line 59: Line 59:
  
 ===== Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) ===== ===== Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) =====
 +  * Many, but not all, species within the agrobacteria-rhizobia complex have a conserved gene cluster that encode the T6SS. This system is involved in interbacterial competition.
 +
   * Lin et al. (2013) Systematic dissection of the Agrobacterium type VI secretion system reveals machinery and secreted components for subcomplex formation. PLOS ONE 8, e67647. [[https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067647]]   * Lin et al. (2013) Systematic dissection of the Agrobacterium type VI secretion system reveals machinery and secreted components for subcomplex formation. PLOS ONE 8, e67647. [[https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067647]]
   * Lin et al. (2014). Fha Interaction with Phosphothreonine of TssL Activates Type VI Secretion in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. PLOS Pathog 10, e1003991. [[https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003991]]   * Lin et al. (2014). Fha Interaction with Phosphothreonine of TssL Activates Type VI Secretion in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. PLOS Pathog 10, e1003991. [[https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003991]]
Line 65: Line 67:
   * Wu et al. (2021) Diversification of the type VI secretion system in agrobacteria. mBio 12, e01927-21. [[https://10.1128/mBio.01927-21]]   * Wu et al. (2021) Diversification of the type VI secretion system in agrobacteria. mBio 12, e01927-21. [[https://10.1128/mBio.01927-21]]
   * Chou et al. (2022). Modular evolution of secretion systems and virulence plasmids in a bacterial species complex. BMC Biol 20:16. [[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01221-y]]   * Chou et al. (2022). Modular evolution of secretion systems and virulence plasmids in a bacterial species complex. BMC Biol 20:16. [[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01221-y]]
 +    * Molecular evolution of the T6SS genes in BV1; diversity of effector genes.
  
  
Line 70: Line 73:
 ===== Transcriptome ===== ===== Transcriptome =====
   * Haryono et al. (2019) Differentiations in gene content and expression response to virulence induction between two Agrobacterium strains. Front Microbiol 10, 1554. [[https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01554]]   * Haryono et al. (2019) Differentiations in gene content and expression response to virulence induction between two Agrobacterium strains. Front Microbiol 10, 1554. [[https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01554]]
 +  * Waldburger et al. (2023) Transcriptome architecture of the three main lineages of agrobacteria. mSystems 8, e00333-23. [[https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00333-23]]
  
  
Line 77: Line 81:
 ===== Host Range ===== ===== Host Range =====
   * Hwang et al. (2013) Characterization and host range of five tumorigenic Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains and possible application in plant transient transformation assays. Plant Pathol 62, 1384–1397. [[https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12046]]   * Hwang et al. (2013) Characterization and host range of five tumorigenic Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains and possible application in plant transient transformation assays. Plant Pathol 62, 1384–1397. [[https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12046]]
 +
 +
 +===== Microbiota =====
 +  * Faist et al. (2016) Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) crown galls host distinct microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol 82, 5542–5552. [[https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01131-16]]
 +  * Wang et al. (2023) Soil inoculation and blocker-mediated sequencing show effects of the antibacterial T6SS on agrobacterial tumorigenesis and gallobiome. mBio 14, e00177-23. [[https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00177-23]]
  
  
literature.1684402178.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/05/18 09:29 by chk